" /> IntelliBible.com

How To Be Saved – The Basics

January 7th, 2010

If you or anyone you know is wondering how to be saved, here's a great resource that will lay it all out for you.

Jessie sent me an email with this video from Tangle. This is probably the best presentation I've seen. In very simple terms, it tackles the most asked questions, including:

  • Why is there a Hell? Why would a loving God send people there?
  • what is the plan of salvation?
  • What are the "rules" to being saved?
  • Why was Jesus crucified?
  • What is grace?

Take a few minutes and watch this. It's done in a style that will hold your attention and does a great job of clearing up some basic issues about how to be saved and what that really means.

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Randy Reed Faith, Salvation , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Bigotry of Tolerance: A Christmas Message

December 25th, 2009

As I write this its 6:00 am, Christmas morning. I just wanted to take a second a wish you all a Merry Christmas and I pray you all have a great day celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ.

The world has entered a phase where this day has become a non-holiday in the eyes of a lot of people, a loud minority that is "offended" because we do not believe as they do. These people who scream "tolerance" are attempting to silence Christians by removing the very core of the reason the holiday was established in the first place.


I am going to be spending the morning celebrating Christmas at a place where everyone is a believer, except one. Because of that one person, everyone else tends to dance around the issue and not bring up the name of the one whose birth we are celebrating. I'm guilty of it, too. In the past, I have tried to keep everybody happy by going along and not offending anyone by forcing them to hear the name of Jesus spoken out loud.


But, this is OUR holiday to celebrate the birth of OUR lord and Savior. We need to stand up and let people know. If someone wants to ignore the reason we all gather together on the 25th of December to exchange gifts, sing songs and praise our God, fine. I'm not "offended" by that. Let them go to work.


Why are the taking the day to celebrate something they don't believe in, don't care about and are actively trying to eliminate from our culture?


The bigotry of "tolerance" wants to keep the name of Jesus out of the holiday created to celebrate His birth and still be able to enjoy the superficial customs that have been added to it. They want their "holiday" dinner and their "holiday" presents without having a reason for the "holiday" in the first place.


You can walk around any town, get on television and radio and speak freely about any god you want. You can talk about the universe, allah, shiva, the goddess or any other "deity", but you can't say the name of Jesus without "offending" someone. It doesn't matter that suppression of that particular freedom is offensive to those of us who take the Creator of the universe seriously. There is something to think about there. If you were satan and wanted to suppress the only power that could cause you any harm, whose name would you attempt to keep off people's lips?


As offensive as it may be, I am proud to stand up and say


JESUS IS LORD


and today, Christmas, is set aside to celebrate the birth of the one who came to earth for the sole purpose sacrificing His life, paying for our sins, taking satan on face to face, throwing wide the doors to the bosom of Abraham to set free the ones that had been waiting for Him and giving everyone of us that accepts Him as Lord to enter into His presence forever.

Matthew 27 (New King James Version)

51 Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, 52 and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; 53 and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.


Today is Christmas! Celebrate the birth of our Lord!

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Randy Reed General Notes

When Was Jesus Really Born?

December 16th, 2009
The Birth Of Jesus ChristThere are many ideas on the date of Jesus’ actual birth and several of them have merit. I’m going to outline the evidence for one that, I think, seems to fit the best. Keep in mind that the day we celebrate the birth of Christ is not really all that critical. It’s the reason we celebrate, not when we celebrate, that’s important.
 
Elizabeth, John’s mother, was a cousin of Mary and the wife of a priest named Zacharias who was of the “course” of Abijah. (Priests were divided into 24 courses and each course officiated in the Temple for one week, from sabbath to sabbath.)
 
John the Baptist was born to Elizabeth, Mary’s cousin, and a priest named Zacharias. Zacharias served in the temple during the course of Abijah. A “course” was a group of priests that served in the temple for seven days, from Sabbath to Sabbath. The priests were divided into 24 courses. The course of Abijah was the 8th course.
 
Luke 1 (New King James Version)
  
5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.
 
 
We know from historical records that the temple was destroyed on August 5th, 70 a.d. and that the first course had just begun their duties. Working backwards, we can determine that Zacharias served from July 6th to the 13th of 3 b.c. It was during this week that Zacharias was told by an angel that Elizabeth would bear a son. Zacharias left the temple and went home.
 

Luke 1

23 So it was, as soon as the days of his service were completed, that he departed to his own house. 24 Now after those days his wife Elizabeth conceived; and she hid herself five months, saying, 25 “Thus the Lord has dealt with me, in the days when He looked on me, to take away my reproach among people.”
 
 
If John the Baptist was born 9 months later, or 120 days, he would have born on April 19th-20th, 2 b.c. This would have made him born on Passover of that year. It makes sense to me that the Lord would arrange for the herald of the Messiah to be born on the feast that foreshadowed the birth of the Church. There is an old rabbis’ saying “Coincidence is not a kosher word”. 
 
Luke 1
26 Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, 27 to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 And having come in, the angel said to her, “Rejoice, highly favored one, the Lord is with you; blessed are you among women!”
 
39 Now Mary arose in those days and went into the hill country with haste, to a city of Judah, 40 and entered the house of Zacharias and greeted Elizabeth.
 

 
The 6th month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy would mean that John the Baptist was 5 months older than Jesus. Mary hurried to see Elizabeth, who was in the first week of her 6th month. This would have been in the first week of December.
 
If Jesus was born 280 days later, He would have been born on September 29th of 2 b.c. (the First of Tishri). That year, September 29th was the Feast of Trumpets, another coincidence. All through the Bible there are recurring patterns, like this. It makes perfect sense that John the Baptist would be born on the day the sacrificial lamb is presented and Jesus was born on the day that predicts His coming back to earth to rule as king.
 
As I said, there are several dates that are good candidates and a lot of people have made some very convincing arguments for them. However, it’s generally agreed that Jesus was born in the fall and September 29th of 2 b.c. fits in with patterns the Lord uses throughout the scriptures, especially when it comes to the Feasts of Israel.
 
The birth of Christ was set on December 25th by the early Church leaders in 440 a.d. on the Roman holiday of Saturnalia, the winter solstice. At this time the pagan trappings, like the tree and the yule log were incorporated into the Christian celebration. See Christmas Traditions And The Birth Of Jesus.
 
We could get all wrapped up in what we should be doing to commemorate the birth of Christ, but it’s much more important that we remember why and not how we stop to remember His birth. I do think that it’s more than a little ironic that the secular world is trying as hard as it can to remove any symbols of “Christmas” from our culture. They are trying to ban things like Christmas trees from public display without understanding that those things are actually pagan in origin and have nothing to do with the real Christmas.

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Randy Reed Christmas Traditions , , , , , , ,

Christmas Traditions And The Birth Of Jesus

December 15th, 2009
We’re coming up on Christmas again (yea, Christmas… not the “holidays”), the birth of Jesus, and in keeping with the original theme of this site, I thought I’d take a look at the traditions that surround the event and compare them to the scriptures.
 
There are several traditions I want to look at:
 
  1. The Christmas tree
  2. The Yule log
  3. The three wise men (and the three gifts)
  4. The date – December 25th

 

The Christmas Tree and Yule Log

 

Where did this tradition come from? There is absolutely no mention of the Christmas tree in the scriptures. I doubt, although I’m not certain, that pine trees aren’t even grown in Israel. So why do we even associate the tree with the birth of Jesus?
 
The origin of the tree is tied directly with the second tradition I want to look at, the Yule log. In Genesis 10 there is a guy named Nimrod. Nimrod was the Noah’s great-grandson (Ham’s grandson) and the first ruler of a large empire. He worshipped nature and most pagan practices can be traced back to him. I read one account, although I can’t find or verify it right now, that Nimrod was born from an egg that was laid by a rabbit (sound familiar?). It is known, however, that he was associated with the sun god and was worshipped as such.
 

Genesis 10 (New King James Version)

8 Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one on the earth. 9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; therefore it is said, “Like Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.” 10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11 From that land he went to Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth Ir, Calah, 12 and Resen between Nineveh and Calah (that is the principal city).
 
After Nimrod’s death, his wife, Semiramis, had an illegitimate son named Tammuz. Semiramis claimed that the inception was immaculate and that Tammuz was Nimrod reborn. Since Nimrod was considered the sun god and Tammuz was born on the winter solstice, the date was celebrated as holy. The winter solstice is the shortest day of the year and to signify the death of the sun god a log was burned. The following day, when the days started to grow longer, a tree was placed in the ashes of the log, decorated and surrounded with presents to signify the birth of the infant. In Chaldean, the word for infant was yule.
 
In the fourth century A.D., Constantine legalized Christianity and made it the state religion of the eastern leg of the divided Roman Empire. In an effort, some believe, to bring the pagan and Christian people together, the commemoration of the birth of Jesus and the celebration of the winter solstice were combined into a single holiday.
 
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that any good Christian should never put a tree up for Christmas. But we should be aware of the origins of some of our traditions and not get caught up in them. I like to measure everything against the yardstick of salvation. Salvation only comes through giving your heart and mind to Jesus Christ, everything else is a non-issue. Getting too concerned with side issues, like this, can lead into false legalism and can divide the body of Christ, needlessly. Jesus should be the focus of our attention, not some dead tree.
 

The Three Wise Men

 

Another tradition we are all aware of is the three wise men. Every manger scene in the world shows three kingly men attending the birth of Jesus. But what do we really know about them?
 
Nowhere in the scriptures does it tell us how many wise men there actually were.
 

Matthew 2

 1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.”
 
 
To really understand who these guys were, we have to dig into a little history.
 
When the Hebrew nation was forced into exile under Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel rose to a place of authority was put in charge of a group of priests called the Magi. The Magi were a special group of people that had two main functions. They were dream interpreters and the political body that decided who was to rule the empire. In short, they were king makers. When Daniel was the head of the group, he, no doubt, told them of the coming Messiah and charged them to watch for the signs of His birth.
 
Later, when the Parthian Empire became the ruling power in the east, the Magi were incorporated into the government and maintained the powers that had been handed down through the generations. The Parthian Empire was a serious thorn in the side of the Roman Empire and the Romans had been severely defeated in numerous battles with them. In 55 B.C., just prior to Herod’s rule in Judea, Crassus led the Roman army in an attack on the Parthian Empire. The Battle of Carrhae cost the Romans 30,000 men and the life of Crassus, himself. The Parthians were not someone the Romans or Herod took lightly.
 
The Roman Empire And The Parthian Empire At The Time Of Jesus
 
 
Israel was, for many years, a disputed buffer zone between the Roman and Parthian Empires. When Herod was named King of Judea he had to live in exile until it was finally safe for him to move to Jerusalem.
 
Herod wasn’t Jewish and wasn’t well liked among the people. The wise men were dignitaries with the power to appoint a new ruler over the disputed territory. When they showed up in Judea from the Parthian Empire with probably more than three and, most likely, escorted by the customary armed guard, it caused a serious bolt of anxiety to run through Herod’s heart. The Jewish people could easily welcome the Parthians into the land and help them overthrow the hated Herod.
 
The idea that there were three of them comes from the verse in Matthew that describes the gifts they brought for Jesus.
 

Matthew 2:11 (New King James Version)

11 And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
 
 
Since there were three gifts mentioned, it has always been assumed the there were three wise men. These may not have been the only gifts. The reason they are mentioned is because of their significance.
 
  • Gold: Signified Deity. They recognized Jesus as God.
  • Frankincense: Signified Priesthood.
  • Myrrh: Death. Myrrh was ground and used in burial ceremonies. It would seem that the Magi were aware of the sacrifice the Messiah would make on their behalf.
 
It’s interesting to note that the Magi, even though they had the authority, didn’t set Him on the throne of Judea. That would be at His second coming.
 
The idea that they were kings didn’t appear until the 3rd century. Later, in the 6th century, they were given names. Originally they were called Bithisarea, Melichior and Gathaspa. In the 14th century these names became Balthasar, Melchior and Gasper. This is how we know them today.
 
If you really want to be scriptural about it:
 
  • We don’t know how many there were
  • They weren’t kings
  • We don’t have any idea what their names were.
 
As far as the date of December 25th, I’m going to cover that in a second post. This one has run a little longer than I intended and the issue of when Jesus was actually born is a bit involved.
  • Share/Bookmark

Randy Reed Christmas Traditions , , , , , , , , , , ,

Faith vs Works – Contradictions In The Bible?

November 30th, 2009
In the class I lead every Sunday, we’ve been spending a lot of time in the Old Testament. It’s important to understand where our religion began and to know its roots. Christianity did not begin with the birth of Jesus Christ and the Old and New Testaments are not separate phases in our history.
 
The only difference in the state of man in the Old and New Testaments is the event foretold by the prophets, the coming and the sacrifice of the Messiah. We were under the law before the resurrection of Jesus, but the law did not provide our salvation. (I say “we” even though I am not, by blood, Jewish, because everyone who has accepted Jesus as the promised Messiah, has been grafted into the family of Abraham. Because of this, we are adopted and share the Jewish heritage.) Salvation was obtained under Old Testament law exactly the same way it is obtained today, through faith.
 
This is the point that Paul if trying to convey to the Jewish believers in Rome. The Jews living in Rome understood and believed that Jesus WAS the promised one, but were having difficulty with gentiles who had come to believe. All their lives the Jewish believers had followed the law and, since Christianity was not a new religion but a continuation of the same religion they had always held, they did not see any reason to stop practicing the traditions and laws they had been raised with. They also felt that the gentiles coming to the faith should also follow the same laws.
 
The biggest point of contention was the question of circumcision. Should the gentiles submit to circumcision in order to join the faith? Wasn’t it a condition of salvation? If not, was circumcision meaningless, a pointless tradition?
 
Paul puts their doubts to rest by affirming that the practice was, in fact, important and necessary.
 
Romans 3 (New King James Version)
1 What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit of circumcision? 2 Much in every way! Chiefly because to them were committed the oracles of God.
 
Circumcision was a symbol of the covenant that God made with Abraham.
 
Genesis 17
4 “As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations. 5 No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations. 6 I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you. 7 And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you. 8 Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”
9 And God said to Abraham: “As for you, you shall keep My covenant, you and your descendants after you throughout their generations. 10 This is My covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised; 11 and you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between Me and you.
 
Paul points out that Abraham wasn’t circumcised when God proclaimed him righteous.
 
Romans 3

9 Does this blessedness then come upon the circumcised only, or upon the uncircumcised also? For we say that faith was accounted to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised. 11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also, 12 and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of the faith which our father Abraham had while still uncircumcised.

 
It was a way to remember the covenant that God had made with Abraham. It was not a requirement for salvation. Paul goes on to explain that this applies to all aspects of the law, not just circumcision.
 
Romans 3
13 For the promise that he would be the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his seed through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise made of no effect, 15 because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression.
16 Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all.
 
Circumcision began with Abraham, but the law was given to the people through Moses. Abraham, the father of the nation, was the great-grandfather of Joseph, who brought his family to Egypt. The Hebrew nation lived in Egypt for 430 years before Moses led them out.
 
If the law was how you got saved then Abraham was lost. It wouldn’t even be available for several hundred years.
 
So what was the purpose of the law? Are we still under the law? Jesus addresses this issue in the sermon on the mount.
 
Matthew 5
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
 
The law held the people accountable and served as a reminder that in order to have your sins forgiven, a price had to be paid. Under the law a sacrifice was brought to the temple and the high priest acted on your behalf, offering the sacrifice as payment for your sins. It wasn’t the actual spilling of animal blood that bought forgiveness. It was merely a symbol, a shadow, of the price that was to be paid by the Messiah, when he came.
 
If you obeyed the law prior to the crucifixion, that was good. But if you BELIEVED that God would forgive you while you performed the sacrifice, THAT was great! The sins of the people living before Jesus paid the price could not be washed away until the real sacrifice was made. Because of this, everyone who dies prior to the crucifixion went to a place called “The Bosom Of Abraham”. It was a place of rest until the sacrifice of Jesus made it possible for them to enter Heaven.
 
Nothing is different between the Old and New Testaments. The process and the requirements remain the same. Salvation has always been obtained through faith, not works.
 
But wait! What about “faith without works is dead”?
 
James 2
18 But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without you] works, and I will show you my faith by my works. 19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! 20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?] 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? 22 Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect? 23 And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.”]And he was called the friend of God. 24 You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.
 
This is the scripture that was used when I was growing up in the Mormon church to prove that the “born agains” were wrong and headed for hell. I have to admit, it was very difficult for me to come to grips with the concept of salvation through faith after all those years of indoctrination.
 
So how does this all fit together? Is this one of contradictions in the Bible that people love to throw at you?
 
I look at my relationship with Jesus in the same way I look at my marriage. In fact, the Church is “the bride of Christ”. I am legally married to an amazing woman, and I would never do anything to jeopardize that relationship. I don’t play around and I work everyday at making her happy (I’m not always successful, but I try J). But its not the legal documents that make me want to please her, it’s because I love her.
 
If I would tell her I love her then go out and play around, it would make what I said meaningless. How could someone possibly love someone else if they are fooling around on the side? This is the “works” part of the marriage.
 
Saying that you believe in Jesus doesn’t mean anything unless you are doing something about it. You aren’t saved by sitting in church every week. God doesn’t take roll. You aren’t saved by a confession of faith followed by nothing, a continuation of the life you lived before.
 
You are saved by REAL faith. The kind of faith that motivates you to work toward a stronger relationship with Jesus. Faith that drives your works, not empty faith, not empty works.
 
It’s important that the works you do are done out of your desire to please God. If you find yourself going through the motions because this is what you are supposed to do… stop! This is how you cross the line into legalism. Get back to the reason you started doing whatever it is in the first place.
 
Faith without works is dead, and so is works without faith.
 
 
  
  • Share/Bookmark

Randy Reed Faith, General Notes , , ,